- Queer Word
- Posts
- š«” Why Iām Weirdly Nostalgic for 'Donāt Ask, Donāt Tell'š«”
š«” Why Iām Weirdly Nostalgic for 'Donāt Ask, Donāt Tell'š«”
Because somehow, weāre still debating who deserves to serve.

Oh, hey there
Oof, the gloves are off this week.
Iāve been doomscrolling a bit too much and got sucked into the latest mess in the U.S., which sent me down a rabbit hole of queer military history. Sorry if it all gets a bit ranty!
But donāt worry, itās not all doom and gloom around here. As always, the QUEER JOY section is here to remind us that good things are still happening out there!
k
QUEER WORD
DONāT ASK, DONāT TELL (DADT)
What it means:
A U.S. military policy in place from 1993 to 2011 that barred openly gay, lesbian, or bisexual people from serving, while, somewhat paradoxically, prohibiting discrimination against closeted service members.
Letās use it in a sentence:
Barry had spent so much time serving under Don't Ask, Don't Tell that he still referred to his husband as his 'roommate' out of habit.
A little bit of history:
When I was younger I never fully understood why Don't Ask, Don't Tell was hailed as such a success.
I mean, I got that it meant soldiers would no longer be persecuted outright. But thereās something deeply unsettling to me about celebrating a policy that essentially says: "hey, weād love it if you risked your life defending our country, but can you also promise to keep a fundamental part of your identity locked away whilst youāre doing it?"
It felt less like liberation and more like a bureaucratically sanctioned straightjacket (straightjacket - see what I did there?).
Yet, as I sit here reading article after article about Trumpās plans to implement transgender military service bans, I find myself experiencing a strange nostalgia for those heady 1990s days.
At least then, despite the rather glaring flaws in the aforementioned policy, it felt like we were moving forward rather than sliding backward.
Progress, however clunky, is still progress.

Not being an American myself, I've only ever observed all this from a distance, so digging some more in to the history was a fascinating (and infuriating) addition to my queer history knowledge.
So, in no particular order, here are six facts about Donāt Ask, Donāt Tell that rarely make it into the popular narrative:
1ļøā£ The military had banned homosexuality long before DADT.
Before Donāt Ask, Donāt Tell, an outright ban had been in place since World War II, with the claim being that homosexuality would negatively impact āunit cohesion, morale, and privacy.ā Whatever that means.
2ļøā£ Upholding the ban was ridiculously expensive.
By 1990, enforcing the militaryās anti-gay policy was costing the U.S. an eye-watering $27 million annually, just in recruitment and training costs to replace discharged service members. And, no, thatās not a typo - $27 million!
3ļøā£ Bill Clinton originally wanted to overturn the ban entirely.

Just before President Clinton took office, he announced plans to allow openly gay people to serve. After significant political pushback, and much behind-the-scenes wrangling, Donāt Ask, Donāt Tell was introduced as a ācompromise.ā
4ļøā£ The full name of the policy was longer (and somehow worse).
The full title of the clause expanded is Don't Ask, Don't Tell, Don't Harass, Don't Pursue. I guess it wasnāt snappy sounding enough, and thatās why they almost always went with the shortened Donāt Ask, Donāt Tell.
5ļøā£ DADT didnāt actually stop investigations into sexuality.
This is the one that really grinds my gears - contrary to popular belief, the military could still investigate a service memberās sexuality under DADTāit just required that there be ācredibleā evidence of homosexual behaviour, or of āintendedā homosexual behaviour, before an investigation could be launched (which was still better than the previous policy, where service people could be outright asked if they were gay).
6ļøā£ By the time it was repealed, over 13,000 service members had been discharged under the DADT policy.
Thatās 13,000 people who lost their careers because they refused to hide who they were - not to mention the countless others whose potential was stifled by the fear of being ācaughtā and made an example of.
Progress Came ā But The Fight Continuesā¦
Researching this piece made my blood boil, trawling through the nonsensical and blatantly queerphobic justifications for banning LGBTQ+ people from serving. But itās important to hold on to the fact that change did eventually come, thanks to activists who refused to stay silent and military leaders who finally recognised that integrity shouldnāt come with such stupid conditions.
And, surprise surprise, the military didnāt fall apart when DADT was repealed. Whoādve thought?

Unfortunately, the fight carries on for our transgender siblings, who have been stuck in a cruel game of political ping-pong, never knowing from one administration to the next whether theyāll be allowed to serve their country openly.
Iām one of those impatient people who wants change yesterday, but Iām trying to remind myself that history moves forwardāeven if it can be frustratingly slow.
Among all the bad-faith arguments and bigoted rhetoric, I found this gem from President Obama, who signed the repeal into law, thatās helping me to keep the faith:
āIt is time to recognise that sacrifice, valour, and integrity are no more defined by sexual orientation than they are by race or gender, religion or creed.ā

Couldnāt have said it better myself.
QUESTION TIME - looking back on DADT, do you think it was: |
AD
Seeking impartial news? Meet 1440.
Every day, 3.5 million readers turn to 1440 for their factual news. We sift through 100+ sources to bring you a complete summary of politics, global events, business, and culture, all in a brief 5-minute email. Enjoy an impartial news experience.
QUEER JOY
News from around the web...
š One of the first lesbian sex scenes captured on film (from all the way back in 1968) has just been restored
š¤³ Feeling a bit unsafe online now that Meta has rolled back its moderation? Well, you might find value in the free Coping With Hate Speech course on offer from mental health app Voda.
š¹š Whilst some countries are sliding backwards on queer rights (*cough* USA, UK), others are taking strides forward - during its budget planning for 2025, the National Health Security Board of Thailand approved 145.63 million baht (over ā¬4 million) to provide health services, including hormone therapy, for trans citizens.
š« The Stonewall Inn, birthplace of the modern LGBTQIA+ rights movement, might be getting its own lego set (but you have to vote to make it a reality!).
š®šø Planning your next holiday? Well, you might want to add Reykjavik to your shortlist, as itās just been ranked the top queer-friendly capital in the world!
š¬š§ According to the Office of National Statistics, the number of young people in the UK identifying as lesbian, gay or bisexual doubles in 5 years.
QUEER THOUGHTS
Last weekās poll
Last week, I asked if you use algospeak online, and hereās what you had to say!

It seems like one of those frustrating realities weāve just learned to live with. But I had a great chat with one reader, J, who made a fascinating connectionāalgospeak and Polari both emerged as ways to dodge detection!
Just one more reminder that queer people have always been masters of adaptation and cunning linguists!