- Queer Word
- Posts
- š³ļøāš How 'Misgendering' Affects Us All...
š³ļøāš How 'Misgendering' Affects Us All...
Have you been asked to 'prove your gender' recently?

QUEER WORD
MISGENDERING
What it means:
the act of referring to someone using words or pronouns that do not align with their gender identity.
This can happen intentionally or unintentionally, and while it often happens to trans or non-binary people, it can affect anyone whose gender expression does not match neatly to societal norms. Misgendering can cause emotional harm, making the person feel disrespected or invalidated in their identity.
Letās use it in a sentence:
āThanks for the help, sir,ā Jake said, tipping his hat to the woman who had just intentionally misgendered him.
A little bit of history:
Remember when the whole trans-panic-nonsense-culture-war was in its infancy, and activists kept warning us that the whole spectacle wasnāt just about trans people? How it might seem like they were the sole targets of the attacks - but really, they were just the tip of the iceberg?
And how, once the tide of public opinion had successfully been turned against a-group-of-people-who-were-simply-trying-to-get-on-with-their-lives, it was only a matter of time before the rest of us felt the unwanted attention of religious zealots and genitalia police?
Well, that time is well and truly here.
Exhibit A: The Liberty Hotel Incident
Last weekend, a cisgender woman, Ansley Baker, was kicked out of the womenās toilets by a security guard at the Liberty Hotel in Boston, Massachusetts, after being asked to āprove her genderā.

Ansley Baker and partner Liz Victor
Of course, this is far from the first time something like this has happened, and it may not even be the most outrageous.
But what really stood out to me here is that, according to reports, bystanders⦠did nothing. No one stepped in. No one defended the woman. No one spoke up.
Actually, thatās not entirely true. According to Ansley some people muttered approval of the security guardās actions, with one apparently saying āget him out of here⦠heās a creepā.
And to add a whole other layer of āurghā to proceedings, after finding out about the incident hotel management, rather than issue an apology and try to make things right, chose to blame the victim and her partner.
Hereās their statement:
āAn incident occurred at the Liberty Hotel on Saturday, where several women alerted security of two adults sharing a bathroom stall. The bathroom was cleared out as two adults in one stall are not permitted. After leaving the bathroom, a member of the couple from the stall put their hands on our security team and it was then that they were removed from the premises.
The Liberty has a zero-tolerance policy for any physical altercations on our property. The safety of our guests and staff is our priority, and this event is under investigation.ā
It wasnāt until the two women refuted the allegation that they were sharing a stall the hotel backtracked somewhat, stating that the security guard involved had been suspended and that all staff were being retrained on āinclusive practices and guest interaction protocolsā. They then went on to say:
āThe Liberty Hotel is, and always will, be an ally of the LGBTQ+ community and a place where everyone is welcome and celebrated.
We will continue to educate and train our team, to ensure that everyone feels safe and accepted within our four walls, and guests who do not show tolerance and acceptance towards others will be removed.ā
Why This Matters For All Of Us
Iām highlighting this specific case not as the most egregious case, or somehow more unjust than the countless other acts of misgendering and intimidation experienced by cis and trans people, but because it highlights the inroads these anti-trans campaigners are making. They are fuelling public entitlement to police and dehumanise others in their quest to stamp out⦠well, whoever they arbitrarily decide is the next target.
And it looks like itās only going to get worse (sorry for being such a doom-monger, but we need to be open-eyed about this).
Exhibit B: The UKās Confusing Legal Landscape
It feels especially confusing and convoluted here in the UK. As you may know, in April the Supreme Court deemed that the protected characteristic of āsexā in the 2010 Equality Act refers only to ābiological womenā.
This means that, according to this new reading of the Act, even if they have a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) a trans person would be considered to be the gender they were assigned at birth.

Image from the London protest of the Supreme Court ruling in April
Following this, the Equality and Human Rights Commission has issued interim guidance for public bodies, which states that ātrans women (biological men) should not be permitted to use womenās facilities, and trans men (biological women) should not be permitted to use menās facilities.ā
But, it then goes on to say that in āsome circumstances,ā trans women should also be banned from menās facilities, and trans men from womenās toilets.
Which, in other words, is essentially pushing trans people out of society altogether.
And, once thatās happened⦠well, you already know the rest.
So, if youāve been dilly-dallying, burying your head in the sand, hoping this whole thing will blow over, safe in the knowledge that it wonāt affect you personally, let me remind you that the time is now.
They are not going to stop with misgendering and humiliation. They are not going to stop with trans people - they are coming for all of us.
Letās stand up together. Letās not be bystanders.
POLL: How comfortable are you speaking up when you see misgendering happen? |
AD
Seeking impartial news? Meet 1440.
Every day, 3.5 million readers turn to 1440 for their factual news. We sift through 100+ sources to bring you a complete summary of politics, global events, business, and culture, all in a brief 5-minute email. Enjoy an impartial news experience.